taurus : CPU and memory usage¶
This page shows how both libraries make use of CPU and memory when handling a gray level image of size 16384x16384.
The test image was created as a mosaic of 64x64 images of the traditional image lena (which original size is 256x256).
In order to ease visual comparison, vertical axes (memory size or CPU) are presented in the same scale while horizontal axes (time) not because time complexity aren’t the same in both libraries.
See the [discussion.html discussion] page for comments.
open¶
CPU and memory¶
| Image lena.png - mosaic 16384x16384 | |
|---|---|
| CPU | |
|
|
| Smil | skImage |
| Memory usage | |
|
|
| Smil | skImage |
Handling time¶
| Image size | Smil (ms) | skImage (ms) | SpeedUp |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16384x16384 | 15.469 | 6283.532 | 406.200 |
hMinima¶
CPU and memory¶
| Image lena.png - mosaic 16384x16384 | |
|---|---|
| CPU | |
|
|
| Smil | skImage |
| Memory usage | |
|
|
| Smil | skImage |
Handling time¶
| Image size | Smil (ms) | skImage (ms) | SpeedUp |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16384x16384 | 130544.694 | 257009.104 | 1.969 |
watershed¶
CPU and memory¶
| Image lena.png - mosaic 16384x16384 | |
|---|---|
| CPU | |
|
|
| Smil | skImage |
| Memory usage | |
|
|
| Smil | skImage |
Handling time¶
| Image size | Smil (ms) | skImage (ms) | SpeedUp |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16384x16384 | 37883.849 | 383656.646 | 10.127 |